In 1973 one of Bordeaux’s proudest wine houses was caught selling cheap southern wine as the real thing. “Winegate” humiliated the region, toppled a great family, and cast doubt over every bottle of Bordeaux for a decade.
The scandal took its nickname from the Watergate affair unfolding at the same moment, and the parallel fit: a respected institution, a cover-up, and a fall from grace. It remains the most famous wine fraud in modern history — and a turning point in how Bordeaux polices its own name. (For the region’s wider story, see our history of Bordeaux wine.)
The House of Cruse
At the centre stood the House of Cruse, one of the oldest and most prestigious négociant houses in Bordeaux, run by the cousins Lionel and Yvan Cruse.1 In the Bordeaux trade, négociants were the powerful middlemen who bought, blended, bottled and shipped the region’s wine to the world — and the Cruse name carried the kind of authority that was supposed to guarantee what was in the bottle.
The fraud
The scheme was simple and lucrative. Working with the wine broker Pierre Bert, the operation bought cheap red wine from the Languedoc in the south, chemically altered its paperwork and character, and sold it under prestigious appellation Bordeaux labels.12 By the time it was uncovered, an estimated two million bottles of ordinary southern wine had been passed off as Bordeaux. Bert, unrepentant, would later claim that fraud was endemic to the trade — alleging that most brokers and half of producers behaved dishonestly.2
The wine in the bottle was cheap. The name on the label was not.
The raid and the trial
On 28 June 1973, state tax inspectors — reportedly acting on a tip-off — descended on Cruse for a full audit, and the fraud came apart.1 At the 1974 trial, Lionel and Yvan Cruse were convicted, given suspended prison sentences, fined, and placed on probation; Pierre Bert was sentenced to a year in prison.13 To pay their penalties, the Cruse family was forced to sell its flagship, the classified-growth estate Château Pontet-Canet — a stunning fall for one of Bordeaux’s grandest houses.3
The damage
No classified-growth château was implicated in the swap, yet the damage spread to all of them: a question mark now hung over every bottle of Bordeaux. Coming just as the 1973–74 oil crisis hit the world economy, the scandal helped send Bordeaux prices into a crash, and it took roughly a decade to rebuild confidence in the market.3 Winegate also hardened the resolve behind the appellation controls meant to protect Bordeaux’s name — the very system whose credibility the Cruse house had so badly abused. Bordeaux’s modern recovery would not come until the celebrated 1982 vintage.
| ~2 millionbottles of Languedoc wine sold as Bordeaux | 28 Jun 1973tax inspectors raid the House of Cruse | ~10 yearsto restore confidence in the market |
- “Winegate” (named after Watergate) broke in 1973 around the prestigious House of Cruse.
- Cheap Languedoc wine was doctored and sold as appellation Bordeaux — ~2 million bottles.
- Broker Pierre Bert and cousins Lionel & Yvan Cruse were convicted in 1974.
- The Cruses had to sell their flagship Château Pontet-Canet to pay the penalties.
- No classified growth was involved, but Bordeaux prices crashed for roughly a decade.
Read more
- A history of Bordeaux wine
- The 1982 Bordeaux vintage
- The 1855 Classification explained
- City of Wine: a history of the Bordeaux wine trade
References
- Invisible Bordeaux, “Winegate: the scandal which shook Bordeaux in 1973” (House of Cruse; 28 June 1973 raid). ↩
- Pierre Bert’s role and admissions; Languedoc wine sold as Bordeaux, ~2 million bottles (corroborated). ↩
- 1974 convictions of Lionel & Yvan Cruse; sale of Château Pontet-Canet; market crash and ~decade recovery (corroborated). ↩
The Story of WineHugh Johnson | ![]() ![]() ![]() Jancis Robinson (ed.) | ![]() ![]() ![]() Patrick E. McGovern |
As an Amazon Associate, This Day in Wine History earns from qualifying purchases. Some links on this page are affiliate links.
Every day of the year has a wine story. Find today’s.









