
By the This Day in Wine History Editorial Team · Researched, fact-checked & verified by the TDIWH Editorial Team.
There is a kind of wine fraud no taster can catch: quietly adding sugar before fermentation so a thin wine ferments to a fuller, stronger one. The extra alcohol tastes like any other. But in 1981, two French chemists found a way to read the wine’s own molecules and tell whether that sugar began life as grapes — or came out of a sack of beet or cane. The method does molecular bookkeeping in an element most people never think about: heavy hydrogen.
Key takeaways
- Adding sugar before fermentation (chaptalization) can be invisible to taste — but not to isotope analysis.
- SNIF-NMR, developed in 1981 at the University of Nantes, reads the site-by-site deuterium “signature” in wine’s alcohol.
- Sugar from different plants carries different signatures: grapes and beet are “C3” plants; cane and corn are “C4.”
- It became an official OIV method and the EU’s tool against added-sugar fraud, backed by a databank of authentic wines.
The fraud you can’t taste
Chaptalization — adding sugar to the grape juice before or during fermentation — is legal and normal in some cool regions and years, where it helps under-ripe grapes reach a sensible alcohol level. But do it secretly, or beyond what the rules allow, and it becomes fraud: you are selling watered-down or over-cropped wine dressed up as something riper and more valuable. The giveaway would have to be in the finished wine, and the finished wine tastes like wine. The added alcohol is chemically the same drink.
So the question became almost forensic. Once the sugar has fermented into alcohol and the evidence has, in effect, been drunk by the yeast, is there any trace left of where that sugar came from? The surprising answer is yes — written into the atoms of the alcohol itself.
The taster asks whether the wine is good. The molecule answers a different question: whether it is honest.
Deuterium bookkeeping
In 1981, Gérard and Maryvonne Martin, a husband-and-wife research team at the University of Nantes in France, developed a technique with a mouthful of a name: Site-specific Natural Isotope Fractionation studied by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance — SNIF-NMR for short. Its trick is to look at deuterium, the rare “heavy” form of hydrogen, and measure exactly how it is distributed across the different positions in a molecule of ethanol.
That distribution is not random. A plant lays down a subtly different pattern of heavy hydrogen in its sugars depending on how it photosynthesizes and where it grew, and fermentation carries that pattern into the alcohol. So the wine’s alcohol keeps a faint fingerprint of the sugar it came from. The key division is between so-called C3 plants — which include both grapes and sugar beet — and C4 plants like sugar cane and corn. A companion carbon-isotope test cleanly catches cane or corn sugar; beet sugar, chemically closer to grape, is the one that the deuterium fingerprint is needed to expose. Together they leave added sugar with nowhere to hide.
It is worth being precise about what the method proves. It does not photograph the crime. It compares the wine’s isotope readings against reference ranges built from genuine wines of known region and vintage — a databank of the real thing — and flags values that fall outside what honest grapes could produce. That is powerful evidence, not a confession, but it is evidence no amount of skillful blending can talk its way out of.
From a lab in Nantes to the law
The method did not stay an academic curiosity. In 1987 the Martins’ son, Gilles, founded the company Eurofins to commercialize it, and by 1990 the European Commission had adopted SNIF-NMR as an official way to detect beet or cane sugar added to wine. It sits today among the reference methods of the OIV, the international wine body, usually paired with related isotope tests that also catch watering.
The result is a quiet revolution in trust. For most of wine’s history, the only defense against a doctored bottle was a discerning palate — and palates can be fooled. Now a regulator can pour a sample into a spectrometer and read, in the ratios of heavy hydrogen, a truth the winemaker never meant to record. The taster asks whether the wine is good. The molecule answers a different question: whether it is honest.
Quick facts
- The problem: Secret chaptalization — adding sugar before fermentation — is invisible to taste
- The method: SNIF-NMR: Site-specific Natural Isotope Fractionation by NMR
- What it reads: The site-by-site deuterium (heavy hydrogen) pattern in wine’s alcohol
- The tell: C3 plants (grape, beet) vs. C4 plants (cane, corn) leave different signatures; beet is caught by the deuterium pattern
- Invented: 1981, by Gérard and Maryvonne Martin, University of Nantes
- Commercialized: Eurofins, founded 1987 by their son Gilles Martin
- Official use: Adopted by the EU by 1990; an OIV reference method, backed by a wine isotope databank
This day in wine history
- 1981 — Gérard and Maryvonne Martin develop SNIF-NMR at the University of Nantes.
- 1987 — Eurofins is founded to commercialize the method.
- 1990 — The European Commission adopts SNIF-NMR as an official test for added beet or cane sugar in wine.
Frequently asked questions
What is chaptalization?
Adding sugar to grape juice before or during fermentation, so it ferments to a higher alcohol level. It is legal and regulated in some regions and vintages, but doing it secretly or beyond the limits — to disguise thin or watered wine — is fraud.
What is SNIF-NMR?
Site-specific Natural Isotope Fractionation studied by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance — a technique developed in 1981 that measures the site-by-site distribution of deuterium (heavy hydrogen) in wine’s alcohol to reveal where the fermented sugar came from.
How can it tell grape sugar from added sugar?
Sugars from different plants carry different isotope signatures. Grapes and sugar beet are “C3” plants; cane and corn are “C4.” A carbon-isotope test catches cane and corn; the deuterium fingerprint read by SNIF-NMR is what exposes beet sugar, which is otherwise chemically close to grape. The readings are compared against a databank of authentic wines.
Is it actually used to police wine?
Yes. The European Commission adopted it by 1990, and it is a reference method of the OIV (the international wine organisation), used with related isotope tests to detect added sugar and watering.
Read more
Explore more of wine’s long fight against fraud in our history of wine fraud, or browse our Turning Points in Wine History collection.
Further reading
As an Amazon Associate, This Day in Wine History earns from qualifying purchases. Book links are affiliate links; cover images are used for identification.



Ronald S. Jackson
Comprehensive textbook covering grape chemistry, fermentation, and methods to authenticate wine.



Andrew L. Waterhouse et al.
Guide to wine’s molecules, including isotopic markers that reveal added sugar.
Sources
- OIV, official method for the determination of the deuterium D/H ratio in wine ethanol (SNIF-NMR), Resolution OIV-OENO 426-2011 — the official method. oiv.int
- N. Christoph, A. Hermann & H. Wachter, “25 Years authentication of wine with stable isotope analysis in the European Union,” BIO Web of Conferences 5 (2015) — the EU regulatory history. doi.org
- G. J. Martin & M. L. Martin, “Deuterium labelling at the natural abundance level…,” Tetrahedron Letters 22 (1981) — the foundational paper. doi.org
- Eurofins, “The SNIF-NMR Concept” and “How it all began” — the originators’ account of the method and its commercialization. eurofins.com
- OIV, method for carbon-13/12 (IRMS) detection of C4 sugars, OIV-MA-AS312-06 — the companion isotope method. oiv.int
Love the stories where wine and history collide?
Explore This Day in Wine History — a new story every few days.






